Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Respir Investig ; 61(4): 487-489, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2327189

RESUMEN

Legionella pneumonia is a fatal disease caused by Legionella pneumophila, a bacterium belonging to the genus Legionella. The incidence of this disease has been increasing since 2005 and has continued to increase following the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. Furthermore, Legionella pneumonia mortality rates have increased slightly since the pandemic due to some plausible reasons. The increased proportion of older patients with legionellosis might affect it because advanced age is a major risk factor for disease mortality. Additionally, physicians were focused on COVID-19 while examining febrile patients; therefore, they might have missed the early diagnosis of other respiratory infections, including Legionella pneumonia.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Legionella , Enfermedad de los Legionarios , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Pandemias , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/epidemiología , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/microbiología
3.
Journal of Physical Therapy Science ; 35(3):182-184, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2267350

RESUMEN

[Purpose] We investigated the effects of the state of emergency declared following the spread of coronavirus disease on the level of satisfaction with graduation research. [Participants and Methods] The study included 320 students who graduated from a university in northern Tochigi Prefecture between March 2019 and 2022. Participants were categorized into the non-coronavirus group (graduation in 2019 and 2020) and the coronavirus group (graduation in 2021 and 2022). Levels of satisfaction with the content and rewards of graduation research were assessed using a visual analog scale. [Results] Levels of satisfaction with the content and rewards of graduation research were >70 mm in both groups and were significantly higher in females in the coronavirus group than in the non-coronavirus group. [Conclusion] The study highlights that despite the pandemic, educational engagement can improve students' satisfaction with graduation research.

4.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(18)2022 Sep 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2032944

RESUMEN

The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic significantly affected the physical and mental functions in older adults, resulting in "corona-frailty". This 2-year prospective study characterized changes in quantitative measures and corona-frailty among a cohort of community-dwelling older women. Changes were evaluated using face-to-face interactions with 39 Japanese women (mean age: 76.1 ± 5.9) in 2019 (pre-pandemic baseline) and 2021 (follow-up during the pandemic). Quantitative measurements of handgrip strength, walking speed, calf circumference, body composition, and background factors were evaluated. Body weight and trunk muscle mass significantly decreased at follow-up. Multiple regression analysis, using change in trunk muscle mass as the dependent variable and background factors as independent variables, identified that decrease in trunk muscle mass was associated with "being robust at baseline" and answering "Yes" to the question of "Do you go out less frequently compared with last year"? The 2-year trunk muscle mass change for each baseline frailty stage showed a significant decrease only in the robust group (-8.0%). The decrease in trunk muscle mass might be related to pandemic-induced lifestyle restraint, suggesting that robust older adults who are healthy and active should take measures that focus on trunk muscles to avoid "corona-frailty".


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Fragilidad , Sarcopenia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Fragilidad/epidemiología , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Fuerza de la Mano/fisiología , Humanos , Vida Independiente , Japón/epidemiología , Fuerza Muscular , Músculo Esquelético/patología , Pandemias , Estudios Prospectivos , Sarcopenia/epidemiología , Sarcopenia/patología
5.
Intern Med ; 61(15): 2273-2279, 2022 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1968930

RESUMEN

Objective The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to spread across the world, and the utility of many drugs for treatment has been suggested. However, few studies have examined the efficacy and safety of treatment with baricitinib, remdesivir, and dexamethasone. Methods A retrospective, cohort study of patients who were admitted to Kurashiki Central Hospital in Japan between April 6 and June 29, 2021, was conducted. Differences in patients' background characteristics, clinical outcomes, and safety were investigated in the groups with and without baricitinib treatment. The primary outcome was the bacterial infection rate, and the secondary outcome was the 28-day mortality rate. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis, including 12 covariates, was used as a propensity score analysis to reduce biases. Results In total, there were 96 patients, including 43 in the baricitinib-containing therapy (BCT) group and 53 in the non-baricitinib-containing therapy (non-BCT) group. In the BCT group, the ordinal scale on admission was 2.3% with 4, 51.1% with 5, 23.3% with 6, and 23.3% with 7. In the non-BCT group, the ordinal scale was 1.9% with 3, 18.9% with 4, 58.5% with 5, 13.2% with 6, and 7.5% with 7. After adjusting by the IPTW analysis, the BCT group did not have an increased bacterial infection rate [odds ratio (OR), 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.36-3.38; p=0.87] or 28-day mortality rate (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.07-1.3; p=0.11) compared with the non-BCT group. Conclusion BCT can be administered without increasing the infection risk compared with non-BCT.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Intern Med ; 60(21): 3497-3501, 2021 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1572223

RESUMEN

A 40-year-old woman developed a fever, sore throat, and cough. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was suspected; chest CT showed pan-lobular ground-glass opacity in the bilateral lower lobes suggesting viral pneumonia. Although a reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) test for COVID-19 using a nasopharyngeal swab was negative, she was hospitalized and isolated because COVID-19 could not be ruled out. After admission, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2.1 from a nasopharyngeal swab was positive for human coronavirus (HCoV) OC43. Therefore, the diagnosis was pneumonia due to HCoV-OC43. Multiplex PCR is useful for differentiating pneumonia due to COVID-19 from that due to other viral pneumonias.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Coronavirus Humano OC43 , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Adulto , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Humano OC43/genética , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex , Técnicas de Amplificación de Ácido Nucleico , Neumonía Viral/virología
7.
Respirol Case Rep ; 10(1): e0886, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1565228

RESUMEN

A case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced adult multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS) and fatal acute limb ischaemia is presented. Arterial thrombosis and MIS are reported as complications of COVID-19. This case further highlights that arterial thrombosis and MIS can occur in COVID-19.

8.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 8(7): ofab282, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1320321

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Detailed differences in clinical information between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia (CP), which is the main phenotype of SARS-CoV-2 disease, and influenza pneumonia (IP) are still unclear. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted by including patients with CP who were hospitalized between January and June 2020 and a retrospective cohort of patients with IP hospitalized from 2009 to 2020. We compared the clinical presentations and studied the prognostic factors of CP and IP. RESULTS: Compared with the IP group (n = 66), in the multivariate analysis, the CP group (n = 362) had a lower percentage of patients with underlying asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P < .01), lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (P < .01), lower systolic blood pressure (P < .01), higher diastolic blood pressure (P < .01), lower aspartate aminotransferase level (P < .05), higher serum sodium level (P < .05), and more frequent multilobar infiltrates (P < .05). The diagnostic scoring system based on these findings showed excellent differentiation between CP and IP (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.889). Moreover, the prognostic predictors were different between CP and IP. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive differences between CP and IP were revealed, highlighting the need for early differentiation between these 2 pneumonias in clinical settings.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA